End of document------ --------GO Up to HOME Page Revised January 23, 2018


PRELIMINARY DRAFT -- Neutrino-Theory

Static 2D and 3D aether. CLICK

Brief Summary of STATIC Graverse Model

Using paired Monopoles that originate from arrested Angular Momenta,
a nuclear-scaled system of alternating Fermion planes of magnetic repulsion,
form an Aether that inflates volume as seemingly empty space.

Labeled as North and South Fermion planes,
this where all particles reside as rotating composite monopole structures.


The Graverse model predicts the above Kaon Neutrino decay into a Muon and Pion from its half Kaon particle structure;
one that is based on paired monopole grouping of the 17.5 Mev common mass [PMF] factor of all stable Particles.

This paper will detail the structure of its three distinct Neutrino classes based on the Graverse Model [GMpov].
The Pion neutrino decay product appears to be incorrectly labeled based on the Law of Conservation of Mass.

Since the Graverse is a new model, this paper will contrast it with the Standard Model Point of View [SMpov] inorder to relate its insights and discoveries.

 Table of Contents

1. Introduction    2. Shells and Magnification

3. Graverse Neutrinos    4. Ramifications

5. Model Differences    6. Glossary and Figures

7. 5space Table    8. PMF Table


Since Standard Model Point of View [SMpov] and Graverse model [GMpov] differ in
details and unknowns,
the stable Particles of the Standard model will be used to contrast the two models.

PMF Mass will be used as the mapping technique between the two; other differences are noted in context.

The GMpov is based on 5SPACE's simple(N/2)^5 scaling law that maps mass range from below the Electron mass
at (2/2)^5 through the Proton mass as (9/2)^5, up to the Higgs upper limit at (24/2)^5 in Electron masses.

A PMF maps to (4/2)^5 while (3/2)^5 maps the Aether's Composite Monopole Pair CMP unit of 3.88 Mev,
which is one-fourth of a PMF after binding energies are taken into account.
The CMP is based on the Composite Monopole or CM paired with its opposite pole CM.

In the SMpov, Mesons are two Quark and Baryons are three Quark combinations; while the GMpov,
describes both Mesons and Baryons as PMF same monopole combinations that reside in two adjacent planes of opposite magnetic repulsion.
These planes are labeled North and South "Femion Planes" or FP's and form alternating horizontal layers
of a polar 'h' scale Aether, that inflates or causes volume displacement via magnetic repulsion .

Mesons are four PMF combinations resident into two adjacent planes of opposite magnetic repulsion.
For example, 8PMF Pions and 28PMF Kaons have two and seven PMF quarters in halves of four and fourteen PMF's respectively.

Baryons are two or four PMF combinations resident into two adjacent planes of opposite magnetic repulsion.
Protons are halves of 27PMF each that represent the two configuration, while the four configuration accounts for Strangeness and Neutrality varients.

Both models use a Strong binding force to hold the pieces together; SMpov postulates Gluons to bind Quarks
while the GMpov uses a similar Strong force to bind the rotating same pole half particles and create an angular momentum based polar effect that is "Electric Charge".

Table of Contents

PMF Shells and FP Magnification

Particle shells involve opposite pole interiors and exteriors as shown in the Kaon figure below.

Shells are inflated by extended Composite Monopole Quads or CMQ's while collapsed CMQ's inflate the Aether.

The Kaon figure also uses FP Magnification that skips showing particles rotating in the gap between same pole FP's,
and uses a solid FP to represent an artifical magnified particle rotation figure.

The normal pion family in its non-magnified Polar Aether setting. CLICK
The four CMQ's inflating the magnified Electron Neutrino highlighted. CLICK

Table of Contents

Graverse Neutrinos

Using the Particle Mass Factor
[PMF] of 17.5 Mev common to all stable particles,
the Graverse Model predicts three unique Neutrino types based on the law of conservation of mass.
  1. 14PMF Kaon Neutrino
  2. 4PMF Muon Neutrino
  3. 2PMF Electron Neutrino
The model does declare them all inertially massless, but they retain their PMF values as an internal structure.
The model offers no insights into any type of Tau Neutrino.

Each Neutrino retains its PMF structure or energy once the parents dual Fermion plane rotation has ceased; however its local single Fermion plane rotation continues.
If a Neutrino could decay, it's PMF energy would re-appear as normal dual Fermion plane inertial masses; as in the case of the Kaon Neutrino in the above figure.

The lack of opposite-handed Neutrinos is caused by being restricted/confined to the parent's Fermion plane pair.
This means momentum is always aligned with the FP the neutrino halves rotate in.

14PMF Kaon Neutrino

The Minerva event of Kaon Neutrino decay.

The magnified 28PMF charged Kaon CLICK
is comprised of two halves of 14PMF's that split into a 6PMF Muon and a 14PMF Kaon Neutrino.

The Kaon Neutrino is comprised of two rotating Kaon fourths of 7PMF's each; which split/decay into charged Muon and Pion particles.

Specifically, each of the two 7PMF Kaon fourth's has an inner 3PMF half Muon with an outer opposite pole 4PMF half Pion shell as shown.

The Kaon Neutrino's two halves split into a two half-Muons and four Pion fourths which combine and appear as a charged Muon and Pion pair, as shown.

4PMF magnified Muon Neutrino

The 6PMF Muon is comprised of two rotating 3PMF halves that decay/split into a 4PMF Muon Neutrino,
a 2PMF Electron Neutrino and two rotating half Electrons.

2PMF magnified Electron Neutrino

The magnified 8PMF Pion CLICK
is comprised of two halves of 4PMF's that recombine into a 6PMF Muon and a 2PMF Electron Neutrino.

When a charged Pion decays, the lower 4PMF rotating pair splits into two halves,
with one continuing on in its Fermion Plane as a 2PMF Electron Neutrino,
while the other half splits in two with each joining one of the top 2PMF pair to reform as two rotating 3PMF half-Muons< The following four images show the sequence of Pion decay.
Decay beginsCLICK
Lower half splitsCLICK
Parts combine; notice pole flip via CMQ ends rotationCLICK
Final productsCLICK

The normal pion family in its Polar Aether setting. CLICK

The Muon's 6PMF and the Muon Neutrino's 4PMF exceed the 8PMF the Pion has available!
This would explain the current confusion concerning flavors of Neutrinos.

Using the conservation of mass principle, the SMpov incorrectly labels the Pion decaying into a Muon Neutrino
rather than an Electron Neutrino of 2PMF.

Table of Contents


Given that there is no neutrino flavor mixing because of the Pion decay neutrino error, the Solar Neutrino Problem returns.
However, the Graverse SoVOL Model has insights based on additional properties of Electron Neutrinos and Space.

Table of Contents
SoVol Graverse Model correspondences.

TABLE of Model Differences

Topic SMpov Graverse or GMpov
Gravity All Masses & 'G' constant Inertial Masses & 'G' constant
Parity Unknown Inherent in a Polar Aether's Down direction
Space Amorphous and Empty Discrete 'h' Aether layers of Magnetic Repulsion
Volume Scale independent Six axes tessellated discrete P^3 polar 'h' columns
Monopoles Not detected Static Angular Momenta N/S pairing
Aether Historical ambiquity Polar column stacks of alternating FP's
Sub-nuclear scale agents Gluons 3.88 Mev CMP pairs
Higgs Field Energy condenses to mass limit 5SPACE's (24/2)^5 upper limit of Mass in Electron masses
Mass Quarks Exact numeric structure of Particle halves of CMQ based PMF's
Charge Unknown cause Angular Momentum of rotating monopole particle halves
SPIN Quantum aspect of Particles Rotating particle halves of Composite Monopoles
Atomic scale Charge Proton aspect Aether ELUX polar chain having opposite bare monopole ends
Charge Neutrality Unknown cause Canceling spins of rotating particles in adjacent FP's
Charge's Sign Anti-matter Flag Rotating direction; CW-Minus-North or CCW-Plus-South
Anti-matter Charge Sign definition 180 degree perspective, Polar Up & Down reversed
Inertia Unknown cause Angular momentum of Rotating Particle monopole halves
Photon E&M Characteristics and lamda A Polar lamda 'h' chain between bare opposite monopole ends
Neutrinos Structure unknown Both Neutrinos and Mass from PMF Structure combinations
Neutrino transit method Unknown Confined to a single magnetic Fermion Plane
Solar Neutrino Problem MSW flavor theory Electron Neutrino has addional sink roles [SOMat part II]
Strangeness Quarky rules Adjacent Fermion Plane Pair occupantcy
Quantum Mechanics Below Uncertainty Principle Fermion Plane [FP] interior
Zero Point Energy Quantum effects Aether Noise
Electron SPINing point particle with disjoined aspects Two CW SPINing monopole halves with two orientations
Muon Heavy Electron Two rotating 3PMF same monopole Dodecahedra
Baryon Conserved Quantum Number Particle core permanently overlaps adjacent FP's
Meson Zero Spin Eight fourths as two pairs of rotating Halves
8PMF Pions 4PMF Muon Neutrino in Pion decay violates mass conservation 2PMF Electron Neutrino in Pion decay obeys mass conservation

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY & Figures

CW & CCW as Clock Wise and Counter-Clock Wise rotation as Charge's sign; from above view

(s) discrete plurals as in specific object(s) vs amorphous objects.

P^3 as 4.236... discrete volume change or step ratio [P=(sqrt5+1 )/2]

----------- glossary ------------

The Minerva event documenting Kaon Neutrino decay into a charged Muon and Pion CLICK

Dron as a Dodecahedron: 12 sided, six axes polyhedronCLICK

Atomic scale H^72 Dodecahedron with middle H^69 dron.CLICK

Static 2D & 3D Aether of Polar magnetic columns of 'h' nodes, compared. CLICK

Just above the Nuclear scale at the H^3 zone where uncertainty begins.CLICK

Nuclear scale H^3 Dodecahedron with a middle Fermion Plane.CLICK

CM: Composite North Monopole @1.9 Mev from twelve 134 Kev Vection pairs that surround a 255 Mev half-Electron.CLICK

CMP: Composite Monopole Pair as two 1.9 Mev [pentagons not to scale].CLICK

CMP: An Axial view of a Composite Monopole Pair @3.8 Mev as two CM'sCLICK

CMQ: An Axial view of a Composite Monopole Quad @7.5 MevCLICK

Scale'd polar cmq vections and quads.CLICK

Gubble: a non-Polar 'h' element as a bubble inflated by magnetic repulsion between the two CMP's of a CMQ.
Note surface has opposite pole of the replusive interior.CLICK

Static 2D & 3D Aether of Polar magnetic columns of 'h' nodes, compared.CLICK

2D Static & Dynamic Aether of 'h' nodes compared.CLICK

3D Static Aether of polar P^3 or 4.236... fm 'h' node columns.CLICK

Charge as ELUX column of polar 'h' alternating nodes.CLICK

Column of 3D Aether polar nodes.CLICK

ELUX: A 3D, one axis sequential chain of alternate aether nodes that connect both ends of an atomic E-field. CLICK

'h' P^3 = 4.23... fm Planck Constant SCALE as absolute bottom of VOLUME CLICK

The Vection: A 1+5+1 sided shape as 3D cross section!CLICK

Four 67 Vection monopoles total 268 Kev that form two vicky's that connect CM's into a CMP. CLICK

A 255 Kev Half-Electron as two 67 Kev same pole, CW rotating vection monopoles with a 121 Kev repulsive mid-zone.CLICK

Aether Polar Axes cross section perspective from aboveCLICK

2D Photon representation CLICK

3D Photon representation of two intersecting photons CLICK

3D Positive Pion with an upward ELUX chain loop.CLICK

3D Neutral Pion with no ELUX chains as spins cancel.CLICK

3D Negative Pion with an downward ELUX chain loop.CLICK

2D Pion Family representation CLICK

SOUTH Fermion Plane: A one fm~ gap between top and bottom CMQ repulsive magnetic fields, where the PROTON Pair revolve in CCW way. CLICK

Monopole: Vection shaped Angular momentum of 67 Kev in a dynamic spin state unless Vicky paired with an opposite pole that makes their 134 Kev Static

PAZIMP: "Plane of Absolute Zero Infinite Monopole Pairs" as the 'Before Big Bang' or B^3 model

Table of Contents

5SPACE's Particle Mass Table from (N/2)^5

INDEX N Name ____ Electron masses * .511 Mev error % Value______ Notes__________
24 H 248832 127.1~ Gev -1.6% 125.~ Gev LHC Higgs as the upper limit.
22.5 Z 180203 92.08 Gev -1.1% 91.18 Gev Neutral Weak Force Boson
22 W 161051 82.3 Gev -2.4% 80.4 Gev Charged Weak Force Boson
12+ Exotic Matter Zones
11 MAX 5033 2600 Mev +10% ~2860 Mev Baryon Scale volume Limit
10 Omega 3124 1597 Mev +4.6% 1673 Mev Strange = -3
9 Proton 1845.3 943 Mev -0.5% 938.3 Mev Hydrogen
8 K' 1024 523 Mev -0.4% 520.6 Mev K'=(Kaon+Eta)/2
7' Pion 275 140.52 Mev -0.7% 139.6 Mev 243+32=275
6 Empty 243 124 Mev _ Table mid-zone
5' Muon 211 107.82 Mev -2.1% 105.66 Mev 243-32=211
4 PMF 32 16.4 Mev +7% 17.5 Mev Nuclear Common Mass Factor
3 CMP | ICA 7.6 3.88 Mev -4.8% 3.7 Mev Composit Monopole Pair | Inverse Chrenkov limit
2 Electron 1 .511 Mev 0 .511 Mev Table reference Mass
1 ATOM 1/32 16 Kev -0.122% 15.82~ Smallest monopole Quantum = 67Kev/P^3 .

Table of Contents
AppendixPMF ; "The Particle Mass Factor".
The Statistics of Particle Mass; its common denominator is 17.5 Mev

Particle Muon Pion Kaon Proton Sigma Lamda Chi Omega
Mev 105.66 139.57 493.7 938.27 1189.4 1115 1190 1673
/17.5Mev 6~ 8~ 28~ 54~ 68~ 64~ 76~ 96~
PMF / 2 3 4 14 27 34 32 38 48

Table of Contents

LINKS & References

author: RD O'Meara Oak Park, IL.

Email of Author: 'RDo.meara@mister-computer.net'

This WEB page address: "http://mister-computer.net/graverse/Neutrino-Theory Neutrino-theory.htm"

1995 ICA paper at BNL

Primes3D: A Construction Proof of Prime Numbers having a cubic Nature.

JID's SLOPE: The Universal Slope of Volume, both Mathematically and Physically   AKA, the Rydberg constant of 1.0973~!

Short proof of Fermat's FLT: A proof based on power sequences infinite transcendental Logs.


My Real interests are in computer science.
I have spent my career as a cybernetic engineer/designer
who is concerned about the future of our digital data.

Our entire cyber infra-structure lacks "Data Sanity";
especially in the areas of forgery and security, for data and their time stamps.

In that vein, I am seeking venture capital for my NEW multi-Computer
Distributed Kernel SECURITY Architecture or 'DSA' ; based on
Posopip: a 3CPU template that inherently guarantees Trust & Fidelity.

Table of Contents